Last week I wrote an article entitled “The Global Warming Hoax Has Been Totally Exposed.” In the article I discussed that some scientists, and award winning ones too, have expressed fears that global cooling is the real danger to our species, and based on history and current climate data, it is coming.
I am not here to present evidence that global cooling is actually occurring. I am here instead to try and explain how the false mantra of global warming is a political effort by progressives. Here is the historical progression:
Progressive political desires date back to the late 19th Century. They are an American manifestation of accepting and forwarding many Marxist principles. Progressivism is a socialist manner of governance no matter how much progressives used to deny any correlations. In fact, as of late they do not so much deny it anymore. They know they have been exposed, so now they retort with “Socialism isn’t necessarily bad, ya know” or some such. The reason socialism is in the mix is because it is all about redistribution of wealth.
Next up we can look back to the late 1970’s and the Newsweek article that new ice ages were coming for sure according to global climatologists. They discussed numerous ways of mitigating it including spreading coal dust on the northern and southern ice caps to melt the ice and warm the Earth. This was a mere 30 years ago. Does science so change in 30 years? Now and for the last ten years or so we have had the same folks that were screaming “Ice ages are coming” abandon that and now are certain warming is the new culprit.
If one understands progressive political wishes the connections are clear. Progressives want socialism. They favor world bodies overseeing nations and in fact that for the progressive vision of “the betterment of Mankind” they favor sovereign nations giving over some level of national autonomy to these world bodies. It’s in all progressive political writings.
Oddly enough the fixes for this alleged global warming involve nations giving over some level of autonomy to world governing bodies to keep us evil greenhouse gas makers in check. There are clear and undeniable connections between ancient progressive political wishes and global warming fixes. Pure coincidence, huh?
Add in progressives controlling the public funding so many scientists need for their work to continue and we see a further dovetailing. If global warming can only be fixed by super-national bodies, and since progressives are all for that type stuff, aren’t the connections glaring in clarity? Scientists who forward this know if they want more government and private foundation monies, and if government leaders and private foundations have a global warming itch they wish to scratch, wouldn’t the two entities getting together on the same page be par for the course? To deny it is intellectually dishonest.
Every global warming fix is some level of nations giving over autonomy to international bodies. That is nothing more than progressive political wishes. Don’t take my word for it – look it up for yourself. Check up on me.
The last major element is the redistribution of wealth aspect of this whole thing. First we must agree that progressives are honest when, as Obama told Joe the Plumber, “It’s better when we spread the wealth around.” Redistribution is one of the key elements of Marxism and progressivism.
Cap & Trade is nothing but redistribution of wealth from rich nations to poor ones. Cap & Trade is creating a false “stock market” to trade “carbon credits. Do readers remember that the EPA – a progressive controlled EPA mind you – in a bid to go around Congress, has now decided the gas every living fauna on this rock exhales, carbon dioxide, is now, as termed by them, a dangerous greenhouse gas?
Do they understand that plants eat carbon dioxide and crap oxygen? How is the gas every living fauna exhales dangerous for the planet? And especially since all fauna need plants to soak up our exhaled carbon dioxide in order to create the oxygen that but for it, there would be no living fauna on Earth? It’s a cycle – ya know, like the climate? A simplistic argument? Perhaps, but still the undeniable facts.
We exist on a planet that needs us to breathe oxygen in and carbon dioxide out. Plants live on water, sunshine and carbon dioxide and fauna live on water, other external nourishment and oxygen. It’s a very nice reciprocal relationship that has worked for a billion years or more since plants emerged. And yes, I am aware of ancient Earth and varying concentrations of sometimes too much carbon dioxide, as well as other times of heavy oxygen concentrations and the real dangers of heavy concentrations of methane, sulfur dioxide and other very dangerous gases
Can the reader see how carbon credits work? All nations are given a “quota” of greenhouse gases they are allowed to generate. These “quotas” are determined by super-national global governing entities. Industrial nations – ya know, the RICHER ones – generate too much carbon dioxide, according to these global governing bodies. And the poor nations with little industry generate by comparison no greenhouse gases to speak of.
The progressive solution is to create carbon trading exchanges, “The Chicago Climate Exchange” for example – an Obama and others creation mind you – to oversee this trading of credits. The progressive intention in these trading houses is to have industry in rich industrial nations “buy” the unused carbon credits of the nations that produce less than their assigned quota – again, assigned by these artificial and progressive created world bodies like the Chicago Climate Exchange.
Is a clearer picture emerging? What better way to redistribute the wealth from us evil rich industrial nations to the poorer nations than to force business to purchase on a falsely created exchange, the unused carbon credits from the poorer nations? It is nothing more than taxation – mind you on a completely global scale.
If one reads progressive political literature there is found repeated mention of the desire to give the wealth of rich nations to poor ones. It’s just like the taxation system of many nations and especially the progressive social democracies of Europe – tax the well off and redistribute it to the poorer folks. How many times have we heard progressives discussing this redistribution of wealth? Constantly!
Do readers’ know how involved Obama and so many of his administration’s big wigs are in being financially invested in global warming fixes and trading carbon credits? Do they? Obama, AlGore, George Soros, the leftist big money organizations and too many others to list are heavily invested in making big, big, I mean Bill Gates big, amounts of monies on this stuff? Does that NOT pique your interests and seem self-serving?
I recently saw a videotape as one of the creators of the Chicago Climate Exchange stated “the potential dollar amount ON A YEARLY BASIS of the Chicago Climate Exchange is somewhere around $10 TRILLION DOLLARS!” (paraphrased) And that is a PER YEAR number. Believe me, when I heard it at first thought he meant in total it would generate $10 Trillion in wealth, but he directly stated this $10 Trillion was a yearly figure, and NOT a total figure for the foreseeable life of the potential earnings.
The total value of all the US assets in both public and private hands is around $65 or $70 Trillion dollars – that is the sum total of all assets in this nation – public and private – added together. And now along comes these clever folks creating a false economy based on trading air basically, and in so doing will generate EVERY YEAR an amount of money equal to one-sixth of all the combined wealth of this nation in 221 years. Is this making your brain go all tingly? If not, check your pulse.
Anyone remember Obama telling us on videotape that “under MY system of Cap & Trade, electricity rates WILL NECESSARILY skyrocket?” Anyone remember that? I wrote an article the day before the election in ’08 about that very statement. Obama stated “they can build coal plants [referring to utilities], but I’ll bankrupt them.” Got that on tape too, so let’s not play word games.
What does all this then mean? Well it means to me there is something very untoward afoot. It is clear and undeniable evidence there is collusion between power broker progressives, government and others to make the world and this nation in particular accept that global warming is imminent and we need to trade our carbon credits to save the planet. And all for a completely debunked “global warming” scheme dreamed up by progressive power brokers.
My last observation is simple to grasp. Global cooling is far more dangerous to Mankind than would be global warming. Global warming may raise sea levels, but global cooling would create ice sheets like those that covered at least 50% of the Northern Hemisphere. As the vast majority of the population on Earth lives in the Northern Hemisphere, ice sheets like we had before the warming ended the ice sheets advance 10,000 or so years ago would be devastating to mankind.
Raising sea levels would be inconvenient, but there is plenty of land well above any potential rise in sea levels unless we’re talking Noah here. But if the ice sheets advanced as far as they did 10-12 thousand years ago Man would be forced and compressed into the Equatorial regions as well as losing the world’s grain baskets that are in the Northern Hemisphere. In point of fact as I said last week, warming would only really move the arable land
to the north by some measure of degrees of latitude, but cooling will compress us into smaller land areas.
If I had to have either cooling or warming, I opt for warming. Of course I have no choice in the matter, but to buy the progressive line as if it were “settled science” is foolish. Even AlGore has recently admitted that the warming he forwards isn’t happening, but still he advocates trading carbon credits. Gee, it’s almost as if he has a financial stake in carbon exchanges. Ooooppppps – excuse me – he does have financial interest in climate exchanges, as does Obama, Soros, et al., – my bad.
What to make of the progressive forwarded scientific flip flop? That 1978 article was certain they were right, yet by about 1990 the worry shifted from cooling to warming. Wow, so suddenly that was out the window but a new monster was acomin’ and this monster’s name is global warming, and oddly enough EVERY SINGLE PROPOSED FIX for it is an ancient progressive political desire they have been advocating for since the end of the 19th Century in America. How convenient for them.
Keep in mind if cooling were the reality, the fixes for it as evidenced by progressive forwarding of greenhouse gas caps, would be to produce more of it, right? Progressives are sure carbon dioxide leads to warming, so if cooling is the bugaboo ONE of the fixes would be more heavy industry to warm the planet, right? But wait – that won’t enrich poor nations and it damn sure would only make the rich nation’s richer, and that does not play well into the feelings of progressives that we must redistribute the world’s wealth from the rich to the poor, now does it?
Instead though, if global warming were the fear and the fixes were to cool the planet by producing no more carbon dioxide than we did some 25 years ago, then that would clearly well coincide with ancient progressive political wishes. Ipso facto friends. I rest my case.